|
The South Beach Diet
Type of Diet:
Low glycemic, low saturated fat
Foods You Eat on this Diet
Lean meat, chicken, seafood, eggs, low fat dairy foods, nuts, most vegetables,
low glycemic carbohydrates, artificial sweeteners.
General Facts: There are three phases of this diet:
the first phase eliminates most carbohydrates including fruits and starchy vegetables,
the second phase reintroduces carbohydrates, and the third phase is a weight
control phase.
Can you keep it off on this type of diet?
Currently there is no evidence to show that eating low glycemic foods
helps weight loss anymore than eating a normal reduced calorie diet that
includes all types of carbohydrate sources, so studies need to be done to prove this
idea. Keeping weight off depends upon the development of new eating habits and
choosing the right amount of total foods from all sources including fat,
protein, and carbohydrate and maintaining a increased activity level.
Positives: Drastic
reduction of carbohydrates causes more rapid weight loss from losing body water
in the first two weeks - some people may find this motivating until the real
work begins. Emphasis on reducing "bad" fats and choosing
"good" fats is a real plus for promoting good heart health and is an
improvement over high fat, low carbohydrate diets. Recipes are appealing and
different, using popular trendy restaurant recipes.
Drawbacks: Like many
current diets, this uses the glycemic index improperly to identify
"bad" and "good" carbohydrates as it relates to weight loss
and insulin resistance. The glycemic index is a very specific and complex
measurement and can't be applied to a carbohydrate when it is eaten with other
foods (the way most people eat) - it completely changes the index and the effect
each food has on glucose metabolism. The South Beach Diet completely
ignores this important fact as do many low carbohydrate diet books. Overemphasis
on glycemic index and using it to categorize foods misleads and confuses the
dieter. - insulin response to food is affected by much more than just glycemic
index.
|
Cost 
Online
Diet: YES
Safety and Health Issues
The first phase of the diet is extremely limited in carbohydrates so it may not
be appropriate for certain people, even though the book says it is not a
"low carbohydrate" or a "low fat" diet. There isn't
scientific evidence to support that this
phase adds real value beyond initial rapid weight loss, although the book has
it's own individual testimonials. Once some carbohydrates are
added back in, it is much like a typical heart healthy diet that emphasizes good
fats and a variety of foods high in nutrition (although cholesterol in the diet
doesn't appear to be restricted - this may be a problem for some).
Diet Surf's Recommendation: Recommended
with reservations
Dietitians comments about the South Beach Diet
This diet gets it very right and very wrong at the same time. It's an
improvement over many of other popular diets that emphasize reducing
carbohydrates because it promotes eating heart healthy fats in appropriate
amounts. The recipes are appealing but the actual menus lack important nutrition
information (are they nutritionally adequate for long term use? How many
calories per day?) and offers no way to make specific substitutions to foods
that the dieter can't or won't eat, so they are very limited. This is important
because Phase II is recommended indefinitely "until you reach your ideal
weight" - that could take more than a year for some. The diet assumes that
carbohydrates are the cause of weight gain in everyone (not eating too much food
overall), and that a drastic reduction in
high glycemic index foods for two
weeks will remove the craving to overeat. There is just not any long term
research to support this concept and until there is, reducing total calories (of
all types) with a healthy balance of healthy foods is a better bet. In a recent
Nutrition Action Healthletter, one of the researchers who developed the glycemic
index, Dr. Thomas Woelver, is quoted "I've yet to see evidence that a
low-GI (glycemic index) diet aids weight loss". For more on this, read
"weighing the diet books" Nutrition Action Healthletter,
January/February 2004.
|